|

War
Spending and the Declining U.S. Dollar
By
Rick Aster
ShamanicEconomist.com
Much has been made of the United States
astonishing deficit spending in the first half of this decade, and
also of the rapid decline of the value of the U.S. dollar, but not
everyone wants to draw the link between the two. Historically and
in the present case, deficit spending is the main cause of currency
declines, and in a much smaller way, the decline in currency adds
to the budget deficit.
To get the bigger picture, you need to see the cause
of the deficit spending. Some would want to blame the Bush tax cuts,
but while those tax cuts are certainly hurting the U.S. economy,
they are not nearly large enough to account for the deficits we
are seeing. This is a deficit caused by deficit spending, and specifically,
spending on the U.S. invasion and occupation of Iraq.
There are other ways to measure a war besides money,
and the millions of people dead and millions more homeless are the
real story of the war, but it is also important to look at how much
money is being spent. If you measure the war according to military
spending, the U.S. war in Iraq is probably already the most expensive
war undertaken by the United States, which also means it is the
most expensive war undertaken by any country ever. Unless the United
States winds it down precipitously, it is likely to have an official
cost over 1 trillion dollars, with the unofficial cost much higher.
And that money is borrowed.
You dont borrow and spend that kind of money
with no consequences. Economists describe currencies like the U.S.
dollar as deficit currencies. In traditional economic
thinking, it is impossible for a country like the United States,
buying more than it produces, to maintain the value of its currency.
Warren Buffett put it this way four years ago: In
effect, our country has been behaving like an extraordinarily rich
family that possesses an immense farm. In order to consume 4% more
than we produce thats the trade deficit we have,
day by day, been both selling pieces of the farm and increasing
the mortgage on what we still own.
In the most dire scenario, we risk becoming a tenant
nation. Our own currency becomes worthless and we own so little
of our own land that we no longer have much collective control over
the prices we pay for housing, farmland, and the other essentials
of life and work.
The federal budget deficit adds to the trade deficit
and speeds up the decline in the dollar and the federal budget
deficit in this decade is basically the Iraq war. Without the war,
the federal budget could be in a small surplus and could be easing,
instead of accelerating, the decline in the dollar.
The declining dollar also worsens the budget deficit,
as the government has to spend more dollars for the products and
services it has to buy from other countries mainly energy.
There were those who supported the Iraq war because
they thought it would mean more oil for the world. Perhaps that
will come to pass, but if it does, it will not benefit the United
States. The declining dollar means that, for Americans, the price
of gasoline can only go up.
Nearly half of U.S. imports are energy crude
oil, natural gas, nuclear fuel, electricity, and so on. The only
way we can eliminate the trade deficit is by importing less energy
through a combination of using less energy and creating more energy
ourselves.
It would take an investment of around $1 trillion
a huge amount to spend, but not larger than the Iraq war
for the United States to have energy independence. And the
cost could be smaller if technological breakthroughs drive down
prices or if people find new ways to conserve energy. The decline
in the U.S. dollar is likely to continue until the economy returns
to its peacetime footing and the country decides to take the idea
of energy independence seriously.
Known
as the shamanic economist, Rick
Aster examines the spiritual issues he says are found in all
decisions about limited resources. He is the author of the forthcoming
book Fear of Nothing.
Contact Rick Aster at ra@rickaster.com
|